Carnivore: Chewing Through Our Right to Privacy :: Argumentative Persuasive Essays

Carnivore Chewing Through Our Right to solitudeThe tilt around Carnivore is not really about Carnivore itself. It is more of a grapple of whether or not Carnivore oversteps current concealment laws and the Fourth Amendment. Carnivore is a software system package program that enables the FBI to filter and collect email on a overcome of a court order to be apply as evidence. The step up around Carnivore started when the ACLU and other such groups demanded a review of the system in 2000. Since then, there has been a Congressional review of Carnivore. The FBI believes that Carnivore is well within the leap of the law and that such a system is necessary to fight offensive on the Internet. Advocates of cover such as the ACLU believe that Carnivore violates Fourth Amendment rights and that the FBI cannot be trusted not to abuse Carnivore. In return, the FBI believes that the public should trust the FBI with electronic surveillance. Basically, the take around Carnivore is the FBI versus everyone else. Both sides of the Carnivore argue use mainly air of definition to present their points. Since the integrity of the FBI has been called into question, the FBIs line of credit for the use and occupy of Carnivore consists mainly of logos and ethos. Ethos is also employ in order to form an image that the public can trust. Those who are against Carnivore use mainly commiseration in their arguments to point out that Carnivore is a threat to personal privacy and that the FBI cannot be trusted. The FBIs position on Carnivore is outlined in Donald M. Kerrs congressional statement made before a Senate committee that was reviewing the FBIs Carnivore system. As the Assistant Director of the Laboratory Division for the FBI, Kerr has extensive fellowship of the workings and capabilities of the Carnivore system. In his statement, Kerr makes five points ranging from what Carnivore is to why the public should trust the FBI with Carnivore. Kerr explain s that because terrorists, spies, hackers, and criminals used computers and the Internet, the FBI deficiencys a tool like Carnivore to counter them. Another priming the FBI feels that they need Carnivore is to combat information warfare, fraud, and the spread of child pornography on the Internet. Logos in the form of statistics and examples is used to show that there has been an increase use of the Internet for criminal activity.Carnivore Chewing Through Our Right to Privacy Argumentative Persuasive EssaysCarnivore Chewing Through Our Right to PrivacyThe debate around Carnivore is not really about Carnivore itself. It is more of a debate of whether or not Carnivore oversteps current privacy laws and the Fourth Amendment. Carnivore is a software program that enables the FBI to filter and collect email on a present of a court order to be used as evidence. The retire around Carnivore started when the ACLU and other such groups demanded a review of the system in 2000. Since then, there has been a Congressional review of Carnivore. The FBI believes that Carnivore is well within the limit of the law and that such a system is necessary to fight discourtesy on the Internet. Advocates of privacy such as the ACLU believe that Carnivore violates Fourth Amendment rights and that the FBI cannot be trusted not to abuse Carnivore. In return, the FBI believes that the public should trust the FBI with electronic surveillance. Basically, the debate around Carnivore is the FBI versus everyone else. Both sides of the Carnivore debate use mainly argument of definition to present their points. Since the integrity of the FBI has been called into question, the FBIs argument for the use and need of Carnivore consists mainly of logos and ethos. Ethos is also used in order to chassis an image that the public can trust. Those who are against Carnivore use mainly pathos in their arguments to point out that Carnivore is a threat to personal privacy and that the FBI cannot be trusted. The FBIs position on Carnivore is outlined in Donald M. Kerrs congressional statement made before a Senate committee that was reviewing the FBIs Carnivore system. As the Assistant Director of the Laboratory Division for the FBI, Kerr has extensive familiarity of the workings and capabilities of the Carnivore system. In his statement, Kerr makes five points ranging from what Carnivore is to why the public should trust the FBI with Carnivore. Kerr explains that because terrorists, spies, hackers, and criminals used computers and the Internet, the FBI needs a tool like Carnivore to counter them. Another moderateness the FBI feels that they need Carnivore is to combat information warfare, fraud, and the spread of child pornography on the Internet. Logos in the form of statistics and examples is used to show that there has been an increase use of the Internet for criminal activity.